A number of commentators have compared Donald Trump to Napoleon Bonaparte.
Ralph Benko, in Forbes, wrote:
“Trump somewhat resembles Napoleon… in a 21st century context where mass media has replaced armies for political leverage. Napoleon, too, understood Narrative. While leading his army over the Alps — a logistically dangerous and daunting process — to invade Italy, Napoleon, according to the John Abbott biography:
“It was the genius of Napoleon which thus penetrated these mysterious depths of the human soul, and called to his aid those mighty energies. “It is nothing but imagination,” said one once to Napoleon. “Nothing but imagination!” he rejoined. “Imagination rules the world.”
Trump set out to fire the imagination of the rank-and file Americans. He succeeded, at least with a dominant plurality.
Victor Davis Hanson, in Newsweek, wrote that “Napoleon’s own political agenda was a mishmash of conservative authoritarianism and populist social justice.
“Napoleon’s genius,” perhaps like Trump’s, was due to an intuition “that in demoralized France, worn out from both revolutionary fervor and Bourbon reaction, he alone could offer something similar and yet different from both these despised opportunistic factions.”
Trump “appeals to a similar depressed public that feels the chaos of continual economic and social upheavals—and lawlessness—can easily cease and be replaced by a new national triumphant consensus, if only led by a dynamic man on a horse.”
My friend Bruce Johnson agrees there’s a comparison. Bill Clinton, as president, defined his philosophy as “we’re all in this together” rather than “you’re on your own.” That is “the best critique imaginable of Donald Trump’s proclamation that ‘we don’t win unless everybody else loses’ foreign policy,” Bruce observed, “though Napoleon probably would have agreed with him. Look where it got him…He sent millions to their deaths in an unsuccessful effort to gratify his ego. The 1812 Overture by Tchaikovsky celebrating the victory of Russia defending their country from him is one of the great musical compositions of all time. Remember Quaker Oats?”
Quaker Oaks Puffed Rice Commercial Using Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture
Full Version of 1812 Overture
I replied that many people, especially the French, still view Napoleon as a great leader. Below, Napoleon’s Tomb in Paris.
He believed in enlightenment, the age of reason, meritocracy. He built a huge empire, ruling over most of Europe. His victories are studied in military schools. He eliminated the Holy Roman Empire. The Napoleonic Code was adopted in many places. He saved the French government from collapse, and saved the Catholic Church.
“The ideas that underpin our modern world–meritocracy, equality before the law, property rights, religious toleration, modern secular education, sound finances, and so on–were championed, consolidated, codified and geographically extended by Napoleon. To them he added a rational and efficient local administration, an end to rural banditry, the encouragement of science and the arts, the abolition of feudalism and the greatest codification of laws since the fall of the Roman Empire.”https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon
Napoleon’s legacy is still important, not only in France but all over the world. Parts of Code Napoleon still remain in legal codes of 40 countries on five continents, including America and Japan. Religious toleration, army and educational reforms, balanced national ledger and equality before law (all the values we take for granted today that didn’t really exist in the nineteenth century Europe) are only a few examples of what Napoleon had given France and other terriries under his control. He carried out progressive reforms everywhere he went. For example, when he landed in Malta, although he only spent five days on the island, he opened up the ghettos, freed Jewish people, abolished feudalism, instituted equality before law and completely overhauled the island’s administration…
Through his sheer ability and true to his words, ‘In every soldier’s knapsack is a marshal’s baton’, Napoleon rose to the rank of brigadier general at the age of 24, became First Consul of France at 30 and the Emperor of the French at 34. He innstituted a meritocracy in France, surrounding himself with people of talent from all classes of society. This type of equality was unheard of until then. During the ancient regime, only those of noble birth could advance. During the French Revolution, only commoners could advance. Napoleon didn’t care whether the person was noble or not, whether he was the son of a barrel-cooper, like Michel Ney, or a prince, like Józef Poniatowski. What he cared about was talent and ability. The one question he often asked about soldiers and officers who were recommended for promotion was: ‘Is he lucky?’ Napoleon inspired his troops because he led by example. They knew they could achieve the heights of their ambition because their leader had done it before them. And that’s what makes Napoleon’s legacy important – the message that with talent and hard work anything is possible.
Of course the U.S. in the 21st century is not early 19th century France. If Trump wins and turns out like Napoleon, the United States would have to abandon its notions of democracy and government of the people, by the people, for the people, and compromise, in favor of tyranny and authoritarianism. And the world should be very frightened by what Trump might do.